The following guide to understanding the SASB Standards is intended to be a useful reference for companies applying the SASB Standards to develop ISSB Standards disclosures or applying the SASB Standards on their own.
Companies using the SASB Standards as part of their implementation of ISSB Standards should consider the relevant ISSB guidance.
The SASB Standards are designed to help companies disclose information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities most likely to affect a its cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term.
To begin this process, a company may wish to:
The SASB Standards group sustainability topics into five broad categories: the environment, human capital, social capital, business model and innovation, and leadership and governance. Of course, the specific activities that drive long-term value creation will necessarily vary from one industry to the next, as well as from company to company. As a result, identifying what a given company should disclose requires thoughtful consideration of key issues within the context of the organisation’s unique circumstances. The SASB Standards are intended to be a useful guide to this process.
When using the SASB Standards to identify sustainability-related risks and opportunities, a company can first access the SASB Standards and then familiarise itself with the following components:
Companies using the SASB Standards independently from ISSB Standards may refer to the SASB Standards Application Guidance.
To determine which SASB Standard (or standards) apply to a company’s operations, it may be helpful to explore the Sustainable Industry Classification System (SICS).
Many major industry classification systems use sources of revenue as their basis for classifying companies into specific sectors and industries. Although this approach is valuable for a variety of applications, it does not always group companies that face similar sustainability-related risks or opportunities.
SICS builds on and complements traditional industry classification systems by grouping companies into sectors and industries in accordance with their shared sustainability-related risks and opportunities. SICS presents a lens through which to assess companies and establish peer groups, by selectively reclassifying existing industries, surfacing new ones and establishing new thematic sectors.
The Materiality Finder is also a useful tool for identifying relevant industry standards. The Materiality Finder offers companies a fast way to browse industry descriptions and disclosure topics. It also allows companies to review and compare disclosure topics from various industries side by side. This tool could be particularly useful for companies that operate in multiple industries.
Companies can find out where they are classified within SICS by using the SICS Look-Up Tool below, or visit the SICS Look-Up Tool page for more information. By entering its ticker symbol, publicly listed companies can instantly find their primary SICS industry and access the appropriate industry standard(s). At this time, companies are classified into a single primary SICS industry, but that should not prevent companies from using multiple industry standards.
If you are unable to find your company or think the classification needs to be reviewed or for any SICS®-related inquiries, please contact us via email at SICS@ifrs.org.
✓ What is your company’s primary industry classification in the SICS Look-Up Tool?
✓ Which other SICS industry (or industries) may apply to your company’s operations?
✓ What other companies does your company consider to be its peers or key competitors? In which SICS industries are they classified?
✓ If your company’s peers have reported using SASB Standards, which industry standards did they use?
✓ What differences—if any—exist between the company’s primary SICS industry and its classification in other widely used industry classification systems? What can those differences tell the company about the sustainability risks and opportunities it faces?
After determining your company’s appropriate SICS industry or industries, the next step is to review the SASB disclosure topics for each industry and identify which disclosure topics are applicable to your company. Note that because the SASB Standards are designed to address sustainability factors that are applicable to the typical company within an industry, in some cases they may:
In other words, the industry standard should not be interpreted as either a 'floor' or a 'ceiling' for the company’s sustainability disclosure to investors, but instead as a useful guide. For example, the SASB Standards disclosure topic related to genetically modified organisms in the Chemicals industry may be irrelevant to a company that operates exclusively in the commodity and specialty segments of the industry (i.e., with no exposure to the agricultural segment). Likewise, in the Electric Utilities & Power Generators industry, metrics related to direct (Scope 1) greenhouse gas emissions may be less relevant to a power company that sources—but doesn’t generate—energy.
Similarly, a company may find that additional sustainability disclosure topics not included in its SASB Standard(s) are relevant to its strategy based on its specific facts and circumstances. This is especially true for companies with complex or unique business models.
Ultimately, each company is responsible for determining which disclosure topics represent sustainability-related risks and opportunities for its business and which associated metrics to disclose, taking the company’s business model, business strategy and relevant legal requirements into account.
✓ Which disclosure topics from which industries appear to be relevant to the company’s prospects over the short, medium and long term?
✓ What sustainability topics have been identified in previous materiality assessments the company may have undertaken? Do the disclosure topics align with previous sustainability-related materiality assessments?
✓ Do the disclosure topics align with the key risks identified in the company’s enterprise risk management (ERM) processes? Are there risks identified in the ERM processes that are not in the SASB Standards?
✓ Do the disclosure topics align with the key risks identified in the company’s existing risk factor disclosures to investors? Are there risks identified in the risk factors that are not in the SASB Standards? Which sustainability topics do investors most often ask the company to discuss or disclose?
✓ What sustainability matters that are not included in its SASB Standard(s) might the company wish to consider disclosing?
Some organisations are 'pure play' companies focused on a single line of business that is neatly captured by SICS. Others’ operations are integrated horizontally across industries or vertically through the value chain straddling multiple industries. For such companies, multiple industry standards may be required to address the full array of sustainability topics reasonably likely to impact a firm’s prospects over the short, medium and long term. For example:
The SASB Standards include a unique sustainability standard for each of 77 SICS industries. Thus, for companies that are vertically or horizontally integrated across more than one industry, reporting with the SASB Standards may initially appear challenging.
Many companies that have implemented SASB Standards have used multiple industry standards to provide investors with a complete picture of their performance on sustainability-related risks and opportunities. Feedback from several companies suggests that the following approach may be helpful when assessing which industry standards apply, and subsequently in using those standards to disclose information:
SASB Standards are intended for use in communications to investors regarding sustainability-related risks and opportunities that are likely to affect a company’s prospects over the short, medium and long term. However, reporting with the SASB Standards is not an 'all or nothing' proposition. A company determines for itself which Standard or Standards are applicable, which disclosure topics are relevant and which associated metrics to report, taking relevant legal requirements into account.