Welcome to the website of the IFRS Foundation and the IASB

Thursday 28 August 2014

Banner graphic

IASB meeting summaries and observer notes


 IASB November 2007


 

The Board continued its discussion of responses to the exposure draft State-controlled Entities and the Definition of a Related Party.

The Board tentatively decided to retain the following features of the definition of a related party proposed in the exposure draft, and related guidance:

  • the definition of a state.
  • the definition of close members of a person�s family.
  • the term �significant voting power�.

The Board tentatively decided to make the following changes to the definition of a related party:

  • to clarify that two entities are not related to each other simply because they are both significantly influenced by the same state.
  • to clarify that the proposed exemption for state-controlled entities would not be available in cases of influence by a common state. The Board will not add guidance on how to identify a common state.
  • to include the sponsoring employer as a related party of a post-employment benefit plan. The staff will work further on the description of the sponsoring employer, paying particular attention to issues relating to multi-employer plans.

The Board will discuss at a future meeting whether two entities are related to each other:

  • when a member of the key management personnel of one entity has significant influence over the other entity.
  • when a person has joint control over one entity and significant influence (or joint control) over the other entity.
  • when the reporting entity is under the control, joint control or significant influence of a close family member of key management personnel of the other entity.

The Board also tentatively decided:

  • to retain the example of a related party transaction in paragraph 20(j) of the exposure draft�transactions or commitments to do something if a particular event occurs or does not occur in the future. The Board confirmed that this example includes executory contracts.
  • to explain in IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements that the term �individual financial statements� refers to financial statements that are neither consolidated nor separate financial statements, as defined in IAS 27.
  • to retain the following wording, currently in paragraph 14 of IAS 24: �The identification of related party relationships is in addition to the disclosure requirements in IAS 27, IAS 28 and IAS 31.�
  • not to give further guidance on the disclosure of key management personnel compensation.
  • not to change the categories for disclosure in paragraph 18 of IAS 24.
  • to clarify that references to an associate include the associate�s subsidiaries.
  • that the standard will be effective for periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009, with early adoption permitted.
  • that the proposed amendments to IAS 24 will apply retrospectively.
  • to amend paragraph 34 of IFRS 8 Operating Segments, so that entities would not be regarded as a single customer simply because they are controlled by the same state.
  • not to consider in this project whether business combinations between state-controlled entities should be regarded as common control transactions for IFRS 3 Business Combinations.

Date: 11/13/2007